What the science says about sex toys for couples

Science library Couples and practices

Last reviewed: Written and reviewed by the Loviux Team. 9 studies

We check every summary against the study's original abstract: the quotation is verbatim and the figures match. How we verify our information

This page reports on published research. It is not medical advice and does not replace a healthcare professional.

On this page
  1. In 30 seconds
  2. What the studies say overall
  3. Where they disagree
  4. Limits of the evidence
  5. The studies, one by one
  6. What this means in practice
  7. Other topics in the library

In 30 seconds

What the studies say
The question that keeps coming up in these studies is whether couples who use sex toys are more satisfied.
The main limitation
All are observational: an association does not show that toys cause greater satisfaction; it may be the other way round, or both may depend on another factor.
In practice
The data do not allow us to say that toys improve a relationship. They do show that they are a common practice and that, in some studies, using them with a partner is associated with greater satisfaction (Hald et al., 2025; Sansone et al., 2025; Espitia De La Hoz et al., 2025).

What kind of studies there are

  • Observational 2
  • Descriptive or expert opinion 7

We classify each study by its design. A synthesis of many studies or a randomised trial supports firmer conclusions than a survey or an expert opinion. The design does not tell you whether a result is good or bad.

What the studies say overall

The question that keeps coming up in these studies is whether couples who use sex toys are more satisfied. The answers are not uniform.

A large survey in six European countries found that owning and using toys was associated with greater sexual satisfaction and greater life satisfaction; relationship satisfaction was only associated with owning toys and using them with a partner, not with using them alone (Hald et al., 2025).

A study of young women in a heterosexual couple points in the same direction: those who also used toys in partnered sex reported more arousal, more satisfaction and orgasms perceived as more intense than those who only used them alone (Sansone et al., 2025).

Another study, with a national sample of people in heterosexual relationships, found no link between toy use and relationship outcomes when it analysed the role of pornography use (Dover et al., 2024).

In Colombia, women in stable relationships who used them scored slightly higher on sexual function, and in the United States many women said that stimulating the clitoris with a finger or a toy during penetration made them reach orgasm more often or enjoy penetration more (Espitia De La Hoz et al., 2025; Hensel et al., 2021).

Other studies broaden the picture. Among women who have sex with women in the United States and the United Kingdom, those who had used a vibrator with a recent partner scored higher on sexual function (Schick et al., 2011).

In Norway, using sex toys was among the most common forms of sexual variety, along with watching pornography as a couple and having sex in unusual places (Træen et al., 2022).

And in three studies of couples, doing new activities together was associated with more sexual desire and, through it, with more relationship satisfaction; it is not about toys specifically, but it helps explain why shared novelty may matter (Muise et al., 2019).

Where they disagree

The studies disagree because they measure different things: sexual satisfaction, relationship satisfaction, sexual function or orgasm. A single study may find a link with one of them and not with another (Hald et al., 2025).

Limits of the evidence

All are observational: an association does not show that toys cause greater satisfaction; it may be the other way round, or both may depend on another factor.

They rely on what each person reports and use very different samples; one focuses only on men who use remotely connected toys, and another is about novelty in couples in general, not about toys (Dussault et al., 2026; Muise et al., 2019).

The studies, one by one

We have gathered 9 verified studies. Each summary is our own; the quotation in inverted commas is taken word for word from the original abstract, in English.

Type of study: Survey (cross-sectional study)Sample n = 11,9442025

Do Sex Toys Make Me Satisfied? The Use of Sex Toys in Denmark, Norway, Sweden, Finland, France, and the UK.

What they found: The frequency of sex toy use with a partner was significantly associated with greater relationship satisfaction. (Hald et al., 2025)

Population Respondents from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, Finland, France and the United Kingdom Journal J Sex Res

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“we found that sex toy ownership and use were significantly associated with higher sexual and life satisfaction, while higher relationship satisfaction was only significantly associated with currently owning a sex toy (but not number of sex toys) and frequency of use with a partner (but not alone).” Hald et al., 2025

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Survey (cross-sectional study)Sample n = 3612025

Toys in the bedroom: use of sexual devices in partnered sexual activity is associated with higher female orgasmic intensity, arousal, and sexual satisfaction and is not related to psychopathologies.

What they found: A cross-sectional study of 361 women aged 18 to 35 found that those who used sex toys in partnered relationships had greater arousal, greater satisfaction and greater perceived orgasm intensity than those who used them only alone. (Sansone et al., 2025)

Population Sexually active women aged 18 to 35 in a heterosexual couple Journal J Sex Med

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“women using sex devices in the context of partnered intercourse had higher arousal and satisfaction scores (P = 0.042 and P = 0.004, respectively), as well as higher subjective perception of orgasmic intensity” Sansone et al., 2025

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Survey (cross-sectional study)Sample n = 1,7592025

Prevalence and characterization of the use of erotic toys in Colombian women.

What they found: In a cross-sectional study of 1,759 women in stable relationships in Colombia, 72.76% used sex toys and their mean sexual function (FSFI) scores were slightly higher than those of non-users (29.55 versus 27.43); this is an observational association. (Espitia De La Hoz et al., 2025)

Population 1,759 women over 18 in stable relationships in Colombia Journal Rev Colomb Obstet Ginecol

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“of whom 1,280 used sex toys, for a prevalence of use of 72.76%” Espitia De La Hoz et al., 2025

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Survey (cross-sectional study)Sample n = 3,0172021

Women's techniques for making vaginal penetration more pleasurable: Results from a nationally representative study of adult women in the United States.

What they found: 69.7% of women reach orgasm more often or find vaginal penetration more pleasurable by stimulating the clitoris with a finger or a sex toy during penetration. (Hensel et al., 2021)

Population American women aged 18 to 93 Journal PLoS One

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“Finally, 69.7% of women orgasm more often or make vaginal penetration more pleasurable using 'Pairing': when a woman herself (Solo Pairing) or her partner (Partner Pairing) reaches down to stimulate her clitoris with a finger or sex toy at the same time as her vagina is being penetrated.” Hensel et al., 2021

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Observational studySample n = 2,5192024

Sexual Behaviors as a Mediator Between Pornography Use and Heterosexual Relationship Outcomes.

What they found: Sex toy use was not significantly related to relationship outcomes in the analysis of sexual behaviours as possible mediators of the association between pornography use and relationship wellbeing. (Dover et al., 2024)

Population People in heterosexual relationships from a national sample Journal Arch Sex Behav

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“Both vaginal sex and oral sex had positive effects, while anal sex had a unique, negative effect (use of sex toys was not significantly related).” Dover et al., 2024

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Survey (cross-sectional study)Sample n = 6172026

'How' Matters More Than 'How Much': Demographics, Usage Context, and Sexual Well-Being Related to Partnered Teledildonics Use in Men.

What they found: Use of connected sex toys with a partner, compared with use exclusively alone, was significantly associated with relationship status, more toys and sexual partners, greater sexual desire, the ability to reach orgasm with a partner and higher sexual self-esteem. (Dussault et al., 2026)

Population Cisgender men who used connected sex toys Journal J Sex Res

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“Partnered teledildonics use, compared to exclusively solo use, was significantly associated with relationship status, higher number of sex toys and sexual partners, higher sexual desire, ability to orgasm with a partner, and sexual self-esteem.” Dussault et al., 2026

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Survey (cross-sectional study)Sample n = 2,1922011

Prevalence and characteristics of vibrator use among women who have sex with women.

What they found: A cross-sectional web survey of 2192 women in the US and UK who had had sex only with women found that those who had used a vibrator with a recent partner scored higher on sexual function. (Schick et al., 2011)

Population Women who have sex with women in the US and UK Journal J Sex Med

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“Women who reported recent vibrator use with other women had higher mean sexual functioning scores than women who reported no vibrator use or vibrator use only during masturbation.” Schick et al., 2011

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Survey (cross-sectional study)2022

Sexual Variety in Norwegian Men and Women of Different Sexual Orientations and Ages.

What they found: A cross-sectional survey of 2181 Norwegian men and 1967 Norwegian women aged 18 to 89 found that using sex toys was among the most common sexual variety experiences, along with watching pornography as a couple and having sex in unusual places. (Træen et al., 2022)

Population Adult men and women in Norway of different sexual orientations Journal J Sex Res

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“Among seven acts of sexual variety, the most common sexual experiences were trying to watch pornography with a partner, engaging in sex in unusual places, and using sex toys.” Træen et al., 2022

See the original: DOI · PubMed

Type of study: Study2019

Broadening your horizons: Self-expanding activities promote desire and satisfaction in established romantic relationships.

What they found: In three studies of couples, doing new activities together that broaden personal experience was associated with greater sexual desire and, through it, with greater relationship satisfaction. (Muise et al., 2019)

Population Couples in established relationships Journal J Pers Soc Psychol

Verbatim quotation from the original abstract (in English)

“engaging in self-expanding activities with a partner is associated with higher sexual desire” Muise et al., 2019

See the original: DOI · PubMed

What this means in practice

  • The data do not allow us to say that toys improve a relationship. They do show that they are a common practice and that, in some studies, using them with a partner is associated with greater satisfaction (Hald et al., 2025; Sansone et al., 2025; Espitia De La Hoz et al., 2025).
  • What these studies measure is what each person reports. Read them as a trend, not a recipe.

Other topics in the library

All topics in the science library